Lessons from Real-World Device Testing

Paul Charlebois and Eric Olson are seated across from each other at a white table in a modern office setting. The man on the left has curly brown hair and is wearing a light blue button-up shirt. He is smiling and looking toward the man on the right, who has short gray hair, glasses, and is wearing a dark patterned shirt with a small microphone clipped to his collar. The background is a bright, blurred open-plan office with desks and chairs, creating a soft focus effect behind the subjects. A blue pen and a blurred stack of folders or documents are on the table in the foreground.
Resources

Lessons from Real-World Device Testing

YouTube video thumbnail

In this episode of Before the Build, Eric Olson and Paul Charlebois explore the unpredictable nature of real-world device testing. Even the best-designed devices, prepared with careful simulations and usability studies, can behave very differently when used in actual clinical or emergency situations.

Eric opens by reflecting on the limits of design planning. Teams work hard to understand workflows, but sometimes no amount of mockups or lab testing can replicate the stress, urgency, or unpredictability of real life. Paul recalls a neurosurgery case where a circulating nurse struggled with a specialized cutting device. In the dark, under pressure from the surgical team, she had to fumble with instructions while the surgeon demanded immediate action. The moment highlighted how hard it is to simulate stress during usability studies and raised important questions about testing devices under realistic conditions.

When Training Meets Reality

Eric and Paul share additional examples, such as automatic external defibrillators (AEDs). These life-saving devices are designed for simple bystander use with clear prompts and automation. Yet in practice, many AEDs end up locked in cabinets, hidden from view, or only known to a few trained employees. The gap between intended usability and real-world access shows the importance of considering full context during real-world device testing.

Another observation came from an epidural case. The anesthesiologist expected a straightforward procedure with a cooperative nurse as the patient. Instead, the situation turned chaotic when emotions ran high, leaving the researchers to realize how quickly assumptions can collapse. These moments, while unplanned, create some of the most valuable insights for improving device design.

Why Unpredictability Improves Design

As Paul notes, what feels like an “edge case” may actually reveal critical lessons. Unexpected reactions and stressful environments expose hidden design flaws and usability challenges. Ultimately, testing devices in real-world conditions helps teams create safer, more effective solutions that perform in both calm and chaotic situations.

Watch now to hear Eric and Paul discuss the stories that shaped their understanding of how unpredictable use can drive better MedTech design.

Home use medical device usability challenges for a lay user managing a monitoring device at home

Most medical devices were designed for clinical settings, not the patients and caregivers who increasingly rely on them at home. Here’s what good home-use device design actually requires.

Comfort evaluation in medical device design showing researcher recording observations while assessing wearable device fit on a participant's wrist

How do you measure comfort in medical device design? Explore the tools, scales, and study design principles that turn a subjective experience into actionable design data.

Woman checking smartwatch health data UX design with concerned expression after waking, illustrating how poorly framed health metrics cause anxiety

Gathering health data has enormous value for spotting risks, improving care, and advancing science. The problem isn’t capturing the data. The problem is how we choose to present it and who we’re really serving when we do.

A gloved hand holding a petri dish with bacterial growth, illustrating the MRSA superbug explained in a Bio Break episode

Nick and Nigel break down the acronym, the biology behind it, and why resistance to this particular antibiotic class matters more than most people expect.