signal processing graphPrior to constructing ultrasound images out of raw radio-frequency (RF) data, the transducer pulse frequency must be removed from the data to prevent ripple artifacts in the image. There are a number of methods of demodulation in ultrasound although two ultrasound signal processing techniques are used predominately nowadays.

The ultrasonic pulse consists of a series of pressure waves that radiates outward from a transducer. These waves propagate through the tissue scattering and reflecting off of variations in tissue density and elasticity. Some of this energy returns to the transducer, and is recorded as a short burst of oscillations, similar to the short burst of waves that hit a beach after a large ship has passed. Even if there is a sharply defined feature in the tissue – such as a bone – it will be recorded as a group of ripples in the image unless some preprocessing is performed first. Ideally, preprocessing will magically identify the centre of the group while removing any ripples.

This process is analogous to the demodulation of radio signals. It has the exact same intent, to remove the carrier signal and reconstruct the signal envelope. For this reason the process is often called “demodulation” or “detection”. Though coined during the development of radio technology, they sound intuitively correct for ultrasound as well.

The first ultrasound signal processing technique is quadrature detection, or IQ as it’s sometimes called. This method mixes (essentially multiplies) an in-phase and quadrature-phase sinusoid with the input signal, causing signal content of that frequency to be accentuated and all other content to be reduced. This method is relatively simple to implement in hardware or software.

It also reduces the effects of out-of-band noise in the signal. This can be a drawback, however, as it’s often advantageous for the emitted pulse to span a range of frequencies. If IQ detection is carried out in hardware, a reduction in digitizing rate can be considered, thereby enabling further cost reduction. IQ demodulation is typically performed as a first step for Doppler measurements.

The raw signal after IQ detection can still be quite ripply at twice the carrier frequency, requiring a reasonable amount of low-pass filtering before the image is constructed. This results in some blurring. The first graph at the top of this blog shows a typical ultrasound echo signal and its corresponding envelope estimated using IQ detection. Note the double-frequency ripple.

Hilbert signal processing graph

The second ultrasound signal processing technique employs the Hilbert transform. It gives good results and is becoming more widely used with the advent of higher sample rates and higher digital processing capabilities. This somewhat esoteric mathematical function has the interesting property that it shifts the input signal by 90 degrees in phase, regardless of the signal frequency. This essentially shifts the peaks of the ripples in the RF data halfway in time towards the troughs. This modified signal and the original one can be combined, so that one fills in the ripples of the other, thereby estimating the envelope magnitude. The result is a very good approximation of the pulse energy, reducing the ripple image artifacts while maximizing image detail. . The second graph shows the same signal but with its Hilbert Transform superimposed as well as the estimated envelope.

On the downside, faithfully calculating the Hilbert transform fast enough to support decent frame rates takes a fair amount of computational power. Acceptable discrete-time representations of the transform can be performed at lower cost by either limiting the effective frequency range or simply by trading off overall faithfulness to balance cost and image quality. With the steady increase in computational power available in recent years, this method can be extremely effective

Both of these modulation techniques have their place and this means both will probably be used in modern ultrasound systems for the foreseeable future.

Kenneth MacCallum, PEng, is a Principal Engineering Physicist at Starfish Medical. He works on Medical Device Development for a variety of areas including ultrasound applications.


2 responses to “Pros and cons of two popular Ultrasound signal processing techniques”

  1. Roger Larsson says:

    Hello Starfish Medical!

    My name is Roger Larsson and I’m a Master of Science-student in Electrical Engineering at Lund University.
    I’m currently doing my Master Thesis in Biomedical Engineering where I’m working with medical ultrasound. Now when I’m writing my report, I stumbled upon your great illustrations of RF-, IQ-data and Hilbert Transform.

    I was wondering if it would be OK with you if I used them as illustrations in my thesis report (with reference back to you of cause). The illustrations in mind are:
    https://starfishmedical.com/2015/02/19/pros-cons-two-popular-ultrasound-signal-processing-techniques/

    Kind regards
    Roger Larsson

  2. Hi Roger,
    Yes, by all means, use the images. I’m glad you find them useful.
    Cheers,
    Kenneth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *