Do you know the most overlooked step in creating a useful medical device?

It might sound surprising, but if we were to look at a graveyard of failed products, more often than not they fail because, while they deliver their promise, they fail the user. Do not underestimate how critical it is to seek user feedback in the design process. User feedback is essential for making educated design decisions.

Usefulness isn’t just about features and functionality. It is about designing a product for the whole human being; which encompasses emotional, psychological and physical aspects.

What is the best practice for getting user feedback? As an intern at StarFish Medical, I recently participated in a laser eye surgery device usability study for our client, STRŌMA Medical. In this post, I share how to get the most out of user testing and medical devices by drawing upon my experience working with the ID/HF team on the medical device usability testing study.

Ask Open-Ended Questions and Dig Deeper

For example, in my thesis, I discovered that some analogous devices worked well but, children were afraid of them. As a result, they would not use the devices. When conducting my usability testing, I would never have asked questions like, “Are kids afraid of the device” or “Do kids scream and cry when using the device”? These were learnings that I would not have anticipated, that turned out to be one of the project’s most important findings.

By asking follow-up questions and letting conversations flow, I discovered an extremely negative user experience with an analogous device, and thus an excellent opportunity for innovation.

Avoid Leading Questions

There is a substantial difference between:

If you ask someone where they want a button, they will assume it is a button. In fact, it could be a switch, a lever, a knob, or a unicorn horn. Asking “where do you want the button” infers the solution is a button. It pushes users towards a response that discounts all other possible scenarios.

A unicorn horn could be a great on/off solution, but the user never knew it was an option. When you avoid leading questions, you avoid assumptions and allow anything and everything to be a possibility.

Be Aware of Your Own Biases

Recently we completed a formative evaluation for a system that includes an overhead gantry which presents a volume above the patient’s head and descends during the procedure. During Usability testing, we tested two different-sized gantry heads to determine which size end users would prefer. Participants were asked to lie underneath the heads and describe their perceptions of each version. We did not tell users which size was being tested.

I had anticipated that participants would prefer a smaller gantry head as a larger head might feel claustrophobic. To my surprise, the majority of participants preferred the larger gantry head. They explained the larger head blocked off the rest of the room from their visual field, which was “comforting”.

Often designers either discount concepts before they even hit the page or have a false sense of confidence about their concept based on their own assumptions. Recognizing our own unconscious biases and assumptions around the size of the gantry, we knew this factor needed to be tested. As a result, the device design is more comfortable for users.