Breath Testing in Medical Devices: From Impairment to Gut Health

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik seated against a white background, wearing lavalier microphones. The woman on the left has long brown curly hair and is wearing a beige cardigan over a taupe top. The man on the right is wearing glasses and a blue button-up shirt. They appear to be engaged in conversation or a video interview.
Resources

Breath Testing in Medical Devices: From Impairment to Gut Health

Sector: Diagnostics

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, we explore how breath testing in medical devices is transforming diagnostics. Mark Drlik walks through how this technology supports everything from roadside impairment detection to gastrointestinal analysis. With advances in sensor design and regulatory strategy, breath-based diagnostics are becoming more versatile and reliable.

How Breath Testing Works

Breath testing provides a non-invasive window into the body’s chemistry. While some tests measure ethanol levels for roadside impairment checks, others detect gases from bacterial activity in the digestive tract. These tests typically begin with a fasting period. After collecting a baseline breath sample, the patient ingests a sugar-based substance. Over time, their body’s response is recorded through exhaled gases.

This breath data reveals how the gut processes nutrients and how the microbiome behaves—helping clinicians make accurate diagnoses without invasive procedures.

Key Challenges in Breath-Based Diagnostics

Breath testing in medical devices involves several technical challenges. For instance, moisture in breath can damage internal sensors or promote mold growth. Additionally, when devices are reused, designers must reduce cross-contamination risks between patients and healthcare professionals.

Sensor accuracy also plays a crucial role. The readings must be precise and consistent, especially if breath samples are collected remotely or mailed to labs.

Understanding the Regulatory Landscape

Breath testing devices fall under different regulations based on their use:

  • Roadside devices are governed by the U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • Clinical breath tests used in emergency care are usually classified as Class II medical devices.
  • Lab-based breath diagnostics follow separate FDA and CLIA regulations.

Because each regulatory pathway differs, developers must define the use case early in the design process.

Why Breath Testing Matters

Breath testing in medical devices represents a growing opportunity for non-invasive diagnostics. Not only does it enable quicker results, but it also improves patient comfort and expands the reach of diagnostic tools beyond hospitals and clinics.

A healthcare professional in a sterile gown and gloves holds an endoscope, with a red arrow pointing toward the device. Beside it, a handheld cleaning brush is shown, symbolizing the manual cleaning process. Text overlay reads “Not sterile. Just safe?”

Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene.

Sterilizing medical devices using various FDA-approved methods - Image showing three medical-related items—a pulse oximeter, surgical scissors, and a catheter with a Luer lock—on a light background. A bold label at the top reads ‘How to sterilize?’ with an arrow pointing to the pulse oximeter, indicating a question about sterilization methods for these devices.

Ariana and Mark walk through FDA-approved options and explain how to select the right one for your product. From metals to plastics and electronics, not all devices can handle the same process.

X-ray image showing two human knees side-by-side. The right knee appears intact with natural bone structure, while the left knee has a visible knee replacement implant, including metallic components. A bold caption in the upper center reads "Bone or not?" and a red curved arrow points from the text to the knee with the implant, emphasizing the contrast between natural bone and artificial joint.

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark dive into the biomechanics and materials science behind osseointegration for implants.

Split image showing two close-up views of a human eye. On the left, the eye is seen through thick black-framed glasses, indicating impaired vision. On the right, the same eye is enhanced with a futuristic digital overlay of concentric circles and interface elements, suggesting advanced vision restoration technology. A red curved arrow points from left to right, implying improvement. Bold text at the top reads "Restoring Vision?"

Ariana and Mark explore how accommodative intraocular lens technology may one day restore natural vision for people who require cataract surgery or suffer from presbyopia. As Mark shares, traditional bifocals are not ideal, and new lens solutions may offer better outcomes.