Dana Trousil

Prototype vs Production tooling

Prototype vs. Production tooling“What’s the difference between production tooling vs prototype?” and “What quality can I expect?” are often questions that I get asked from development or clients. The best answer begins with other questions: “What quality do you really need?”, and “How many are you making?”



All products have a life cycle, and graphs like these can be seen in various forms:


For start-ups of unique medical devices, there often isn’t even a similar product in the portfolio that the the initial slope can be estimated, and so we’re left with a best guess.  Tooling for any product can be very expensive, and without knowing how many will be sold, the return on investment (ROI) for the capital expense of tooling may fall into a grey area – maybe the ROI will be acceptable if volumes are high, but maybe not if we don’t hit the sales we think we could.

Full production tooling is expensive and a lot of the time can’t be justified. So what does one get with “prototype” tooling? The answer can be “a lot”.  In this blog I’ll concentrate on injection moulding, but there are analogs for other processes.

Prototype injection moulding comes in a couple of forms, namely aluminium or steel tools, like P20. Aluminium tools have the advantage that machining is easier, but it comes at the cost of not having the same thermal mass and cooling as a standard steel tool.  A lot of injection moulders simply choose not to work with aluminium because the cost savings compared to P20 steel tools aren’t that great with off-shore tooling, and there are significant compromises with aluminium tools.

P20 is often used as a cost-effective tool, but the steel may see more wear over time. Injection moulding parts are cost effective, but there is a significant set-up that’s usually rolled into the cost of the parts. While costs are minimal over large runs, the smaller runs of typical production start-ups may mean that a tool is run once, then shelved for six months. P20 requires a bit more care in maintenance to ensure the tool doesn’t rust in the meantime. Glass-fill materials also cause more wear and maintenance.

There are numerous prototype tooling injection moulders out there, but it’s important to recognize that their expertise may not match the expertise that a full production shop has. Designers may have to take on more of the design of the tool, reviewing or performing mould flow analysis, or even reviewing cooling lines, the latter is often much poorer in prototype tools than in a full production tool. Why are cooling lines important? They affect the heat of the tool, and therefore the heat of the plastic. Not controlling the heat of the plastic can result in part defects like gloss, weld lines, warping, or even mechanical properties.

Injection moulding, even prototype tooling, can still be expensive. If your volumes aren’t high enough, consider using other processes like Reaction Injection Molding (RIM), cast urethane (silicone rubber moulding – SRM), or even machining.  Note that these processes require painting, which has its own low-volume production issues. A good paint shop can do fantastic finishes with only low volume, but it’s not the same as a full production line where the processes are fully controlled.

In the drive to production, it’s important to understand the volumes involved, and align expectations of what your chosen production process can achieve.

Image: 4074658 © Robyn Mackenzie / Dreamstime.com

Dana Trousil is a StarFish Medical Manufacturing Engineer.  He has successfully launched many products, from small volume production up to moderate volumes (up to 1 million parts per year).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join over 6000 medical device professionals who receive our engineering, regulatory and commercialization insights and tips every month.

Website Survey

Please answer a few questions about our website.

Take Survey No Thanks