Patient-Centered Field Research in Medtech

Paul Charlebois and Eric Olson are seated across from each other at a white table in a modern office setting. The man on the left has curly brown hair and is wearing a light blue button-up shirt. He is smiling and looking toward the man on the right, who has short gray hair, glasses, and is wearing a dark patterned shirt with a small microphone clipped to his collar. The background is a bright, blurred open-plan office with desks and chairs, creating a soft focus effect behind the subjects. A blue pen and a blurred stack of folders or documents are on the table in the foreground.
Resources

Patient-Centered Field Research in Medtech

Sector: Surgical
YouTube video thumbnail

In this Before the Build episode, Eric Olson and Paul Charlebois reflect on the value of patient-centered field research—and how firsthand observation can reframe design priorities and impact outcomes in profound ways.

Paul shares an eye-opening story from a research session observing Mohs surgery, a specialized outpatient procedure for removing skin cancer. At first glance, the experience seemed overwhelming: patients were marked with dotted lines, then underwent facial excisions that appeared disfiguring. But over the course of the day, something deeper unfolded. The real story wasn’t just the clinical effectiveness of the surgery, but how patients experienced care, recovery, and dignity throughout the process.

The team observed how the clinic balanced harsh realities—patients with visible, temporary facial trauma waiting together in a shared space—with quiet, thoughtful design choices: no mirrors, careful pacing, and empathetic reconstruction work. These details emphasized the importance of viewing each case as more than a procedure.

Why Patient-Centered Field Research Matters

As Eric and Paul discuss, patient-centered field research often reveals more than what a design spec or user survey ever could. When engineers and developers step into real clinical environments, they can witness the emotional and procedural nuances that define patient experience. This approach can ultimately lead to better market adoption, stronger user satisfaction, and more impactful innovation.

Even when your device isn’t central to the treatment itself, being present in the broader clinical journey gives design teams critical insight into where they can reduce friction and add value.

Enjoying Before the Build? Sign up to get new episodes sent to your inbox.

Subscribe to MedTech Insights
Diagram showing medical device at the center connected to clinicians, patients, and regulatory bodies with text 'Who are we designing for?' highlighting stakeholder mapping in MedTech design.

Understanding Medical Device Stakeholders

Every phase of a device’s life cycle involves different people with distinct needs—from clinicians and patients to service technicians and regulatory bodies.

A fluorescent protein assay sample glows under UV light as part of medical device cleaning validation testing.

Fluorescent Protein Assay Testing in Medical Devices

Nick Allan and Nigel Syrotuck explain how a fluorescent protein assay helps engineers measure contamination and cleaning performance in medical devices.

Engineer assembling electronic components during medical device design transfer process.

Bridging the Design-to-Manufacturing Gap in Medical Devices

Your team is ready for design validation. The prototype performs well, test plans are in motion, and everything points to a smooth handoff to manufacturing. Then your partner calls with bad news: they can’t build the device as designed.

Contract Manufacturer Rejection - Engineering team reviews early-stage medical device design and manufacturability during a design transfer meeting at StarFish Medical.

When the CM Says No: What to Do When Your Contract Manufacturer Rejects Your Early-Stage Build

You’ve cleared the toughest engineering hurdles and proven your design works. Then, just as you prepare to scale, your contract manufacturer turns you down.