Understanding Endoscope Reprocessing
In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene. These devices contain intricate internal channels and delicate mechanisms that make both cleaning and disinfection incredibly labor-intensive. With endoscopes routinely used in clinical settings, ensuring they are safe to reuse is critical for patient safety and operator health.
Why Endoscopes Are So Hard to Clean
Mark explains that endoscopes are inserted into particularly contaminated environments and are often constructed from materials that cannot withstand high temperatures. This makes steam sterilization ineffective. Instead, hospitals rely on high-level disinfection—an extensive manual and automated cleaning process that includes enzymatic scrubbing, flushing internal ports, leak testing, and finally, drying and hanging.
Innovations in Endoscope Cleaning
To streamline this complex process, manufacturers have developed new automated solutions. The Steris Inspire 300, for instance, eliminates the need for manual cleaning between bedside wipe-down and automated disinfection. Other innovations include the Pentax Aqua Typhoon and Nanosonics Coris, which use entrapped bubbles or pulsatile flow to clean hard-to-reach channels. These advances aim to reduce the physical burden on staff while improving the reliability of endoscope reprocessing outcomes.
Is It Really Safe?
While current reprocessing methods report an adverse event rate of just 1 in 1.8 million, the challenge lies in consistent execution. Missed steps and usability challenges can introduce risk, despite the devices being considered technically safe. That’s why innovations in automated systems are so important—they minimize human error and optimize hygiene.
Explore more in this in-depth episode on one of the most underappreciated challenges in medtech cleaning protocols.
Correction: In this episode, we mistakenly refer to the Steris Inspire 3000 as the “Steris Inspire 300.” The correct name is Steris Inspire 3000. We apologize for the oversight.
Enjoying MedDevice by Design? Sign up to get new episodes sent to your inbox.
Related Resources
In this episode of Bio Break, Nick walks through both patent types after receiving two of his own in the mail, one of each, from the USPTO.
Scott Phillips sits down with Mickey Urdea to examine what actually distinguishes companies that reach commercial outcomes from those that do not.
Nigel Syrotuck breaks down the realistic medical device V&V cost and schedule for terminally sterilized devices, picking up after design freeze and walking through each major phase of the process.
Nigel Syrotuck examines the hidden medical device sterilization costs that many development teams overlook when estimating the true cost of producing a terminally sterilized device.