Iron Lung Innovation and Ventilator History

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

Iron Lung Innovation and Ventilator History

YouTube video thumbnail

In this MedDevice by Design episode, Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik take us back in time to explore iron lung innovation during the polio epidemic of the 1920s. Imagining themselves as engineers of that era, they discuss what tools and ideas could have saved lives in a world without modern ventilators, penicillin, or even bubble gum.

With automobiles, planes, and submarines already in use, the technology of the 1920s offered opportunity—but also limitations. Ariana and Mark begin with the iron lung, a large negative pressure device that encased the entire body. While effective at simulating natural breathing by allowing the chest to expand, it was restrictive, immobile, and deeply uncomfortable.

Rethinking Respiratory Innovation

As the conversation evolves, the team explores alternatives. Could a smaller “iron lung mini” have worked? Could thoracic-only negative pressure devices have made care less invasive? What about exoskeletons or diaphragm pacing systems?

They also reference more recent technologies like those from Curious and AirAD, and how modern companies such as Lungpacer have experimented with stimulating the diaphragm directly. But in the end, it’s clear that iron lung innovation was well suited for its time—even though today’s ventilators use positive pressure systems that introduce new performance metrics and control options.

Why the Iron Lung Still Matters

This episode isn’t just a history lesson. It’s a reminder that engineering choices are shaped by the needs, tools, and constraints of their time. While today’s ventilators provide advanced feedback and control, they’re not always more physiological than their century-old predecessors.

Watch as Mark and Ariana explore mechanical ventilation from past to present—and imagine what they would have built as medtech engineers in 1920.

Diagram showing medical device at the center connected to clinicians, patients, and regulatory bodies with text 'Who are we designing for?' highlighting stakeholder mapping in MedTech design.

Every phase of a device’s life cycle involves different people with distinct needs—from clinicians and patients to service technicians and regulatory bodies.

A fluorescent protein assay sample glows under UV light as part of medical device cleaning validation testing.

Nick Allan and Nigel Syrotuck explain how a fluorescent protein assay helps engineers measure contamination and cleaning performance in medical devices.

Engineer assembling electronic components during medical device design transfer process.

Your team is ready for design validation. The prototype performs well, test plans are in motion, and everything points to a smooth handoff to manufacturing. Then your partner calls with bad news: they can’t build the device as designed.

Contract Manufacturer Rejection - Engineering team reviews early-stage medical device design and manufacturability during a design transfer meeting at StarFish Medical.

You’ve cleared the toughest engineering hurdles and proven your design works. Then, just as you prepare to scale, your contract manufacturer turns you down.