Iron Lung Innovation and Ventilator History

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

Iron Lung Innovation and Ventilator History

YouTube video thumbnail

In this MedDevice by Design episode, Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik take us back in time to explore iron lung innovation during the polio epidemic of the 1920s. Imagining themselves as engineers of that era, they discuss what tools and ideas could have saved lives in a world without modern ventilators, penicillin, or even bubble gum.

With automobiles, planes, and submarines already in use, the technology of the 1920s offered opportunity—but also limitations. Ariana and Mark begin with the iron lung, a large negative pressure device that encased the entire body. While effective at simulating natural breathing by allowing the chest to expand, it was restrictive, immobile, and deeply uncomfortable.

Rethinking Respiratory Innovation

As the conversation evolves, the team explores alternatives. Could a smaller “iron lung mini” have worked? Could thoracic-only negative pressure devices have made care less invasive? What about exoskeletons or diaphragm pacing systems?

They also reference more recent technologies like those from Curious and AirAD, and how modern companies such as Lungpacer have experimented with stimulating the diaphragm directly. But in the end, it’s clear that iron lung innovation was well suited for its time—even though today’s ventilators use positive pressure systems that introduce new performance metrics and control options.

Why the Iron Lung Still Matters

This episode isn’t just a history lesson. It’s a reminder that engineering choices are shaped by the needs, tools, and constraints of their time. While today’s ventilators provide advanced feedback and control, they’re not always more physiological than their century-old predecessors.

Watch as Mark and Ariana explore mechanical ventilation from past to present—and imagine what they would have built as medtech engineers in 1920.

Smartwatch displaying heart rate and ECG-style waveform, illustrating the difference between wellness devices and medical devices in digital health regulation

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik break down medical vs wellness devices and explain why two products with identical hardware can fall into completely different regulatory categories.

Nick from StarFish Medical demonstrating antigen detection using a toy antibody model to explain how monoclonal antibodies bind antigens in ELISA diagnostics

Nick and Nigel break down the ELISA assay explained in simple, practical terms using everyday models.

Magnifying glass revealing cracks with the text “This gets missed,” illustrating hidden risks in medical device validation and real-world use.

Ariana Wilson sits down with Mark Drlik to unpack why reprocessing is often one of the hardest challenges engineers face during development.

Thumbnail showing the text “ETO or Radiation?” with a cloud icon representing ethylene oxide sterilization and a radiating burst icon representing radiation sterilization for medical devices.

Nick and Nigel walk through how teams decide between ethylene oxide, E-beam, and gamma radiation sterilization.