Bio Break: Pros and Cons of Platform Technologies in Medical Device Development

Resources

Bio Break: Pros and Cons of Platform Technologies in Medical Device Development

Topic: Bio Break

In this engaging episode of Bio Break, Nick and Joris dive into the complex world of platform technologies in product development, exploring the pros and cons of this widely discussed concept. From in-vitro diagnostics to point-of-care instruments, the term “platform” often sparks excitement—and sometimes hesitation. But what does it truly mean to build a platform-based product, and when does it make sense?

Nick opens the discussion by explaining why the word “platform” can be a trigger for product developers. While the idea of creating a flexible system with multiple applications is appealing, it often risks diluting the target product profile. He highlights the importance of focusing on specific customer needs and ensuring the product solves a defined problem effectively, rather than spreading resources thin across hypothetical use cases.

Joris counters with examples of successful platform technologies in the in-vitro diagnostics space. Systems that can handle various tests, from blood panels to infectious disease assays, have proven invaluable in centralized diagnostic labs. Their ability to save space and streamline workflows makes them indispensable. However, Joris also points out the market risks of trying to cater to diverse customer bases—such as health-conscious individuals versus clinical labs—within a single platform, which can dilute the product’s focus and usability.

The duo discusses the importance of considering market segmentation and customer needs during the design phase. For centralized labs, having a multi-functional platform is critical, but in point-of-care environments, simpler, targeted devices may be more practical. They wrap up by emphasizing the value of aligning product design with a well-defined target product profile.

If you’re curious about how platform technologies can transform medical device development—or when they might lead to pitfalls—this episode offers a balanced perspective packed with real-world insights.

Discover:

  • How to align product design with market needs.
  • The pros and cons of platform-based designs.
  • Key differences between centralized diagnostics and point-of-care tools.

Pros and Cons of Platform Technologies in Medical Device Development

A gloved hand holds a syringe near the palm of another hand, which has a white grid drawn on it. The needle is poised to inject at the intersection of the lines. The background is plain white, drawing focus to the skin and procedural markings.

While most people think of Botox as a simple beauty treatment, there’s a surprising amount of engineering, anatomy, and precision behind the process.

A close-up view of a transparent smart bandage with an embedded microchip adhered to human skin. The circuit lines are visible on the bandage surface. Overlay text reads “Theranostic? Smart Bandages” with “Theranostic?” in bold purple and “Smart Bandages” in bold black, set against a soft blue and skin-toned background.

A theranostic wound dressing does more than cover a cut—it actively detects infection and delivers targeted treatment.

A laptop on a wooden desk displays a digital document icon on its screen. Beside it, bold text reads "Design History Files Explained," highlighting the topic of regulatory documentation in medical device development.

Nick and Joris break down what a DHF is, why it’s required, and how it plays a vital role throughout the development lifecycle.

Two colorful paper boats—one red and one yellow—float on a blue background with illustrated white waves beneath them. Bold text reads "From Idea to Impact," symbolizing innovation and progress in medical device development.

Nick Allan and Joris van der Heijden revisit one of StarFish Medical’s most successful Pathfinder journeys, showcasing how a bold research concept evolved into a fully realized clinical diagnostic device.