How the FDA Is Using AI in Regulatory Review

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik seated against a white background, wearing lavalier microphones. The woman on the left has long brown curly hair and is wearing a beige cardigan over a taupe top. The man on the right is wearing glasses and a blue button-up shirt. They appear to be engaged in conversation or a video interview.
Resources

How the FDA Uses AI in Device Review

YouTube video thumbnail

The FDA AI in device review process is evolving fast—and it may transform how regulatory teams navigate medical device submissions. In this episode of MedDevice by Design, we explore how the FDA is using artificial intelligence internally to accelerate 510(k) reviews, improve predicate searches, and streamline labeling and documentation checks.

FDA’s Internal AI Tools Are Expanding

The FDA has already appointed a Chief AI Officer and is developing internal tools, including a large language model rumored to be in collaboration with OpenAI. Starting in June 2025, these tools are expected to be rolled out across departments. These technologies are designed to support internal staff—not replace them.

Faster Reviews for Common Device Submissions

Class II devices such as blood pressure monitors and surgical gloves may benefit the most from FDA AI in device review workflows. By using trained AI models, reviewers can automate routine predicate searches, validate labeling against regulatory standards, and identify missing traceability in submission documents.

Why This Matters for Regulatory Professionals

While novel and high-risk devices will still require close human evaluation, AI promises to reduce the review burden for standard submissions. This allows regulatory and engineering teams to focus more on innovative product development. Instead of spending weeks preparing repetitive documentation, they can rely on automated feedback to guide improvements faster.

What Comes Next?

There’s still a lot we don’t know, but the FDA is clearly signaling that AI will be part of the future of regulatory review. The ability to streamline standard 510(k) submissions could help improve speed, consistency, and predictability in approvals—benefiting both regulators and medtech innovators.

Futuristic laboratory with multiple glowing blue cylindrical tanks emitting mist. A red arrow points to one tank. Overlay text reads: ‘Bacta tank. For real?’ in bold white letters on a black background.

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik take inspiration from a scene in The Empire Strikes Back to talk about real-world parallels to the Star Wars bacta tank.

An iron lung on the left and a modern medical ventilator on the right, shown against a plain white background. A red arrow points from the iron lung to the ventilator. Bold overlay text reads: ‘Then vs. Now’ in white font on a black background.

In this MedDevice by Design episode, Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik take us back in time to explore iron lung innovation during the polio epidemic of the 1920s.

A healthcare professional in a sterile gown and gloves holds an endoscope, with a red arrow pointing toward the device. Beside it, a handheld cleaning brush is shown, symbolizing the manual cleaning process. Text overlay reads “Not sterile. Just safe?”

Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene.

Sterilizing medical devices using various FDA-approved methods - Image showing three medical-related items—a pulse oximeter, surgical scissors, and a catheter with a Luer lock—on a light background. A bold label at the top reads ‘How to sterilize?’ with an arrow pointing to the pulse oximeter, indicating a question about sterilization methods for these devices.

Ariana and Mark walk through FDA-approved options and explain how to select the right one for your product. From metals to plastics and electronics, not all devices can handle the same process.