Apple Design Influence in MedTech Product Development

Paul Charlebois and Eric Olson are seated across from each other at a white table in a modern office setting. The man on the left has curly brown hair and is wearing a light blue button-up shirt. He is smiling and looking toward the man on the right, who has short gray hair, glasses, and is wearing a dark patterned shirt with a small microphone clipped to his collar. The background is a bright, blurred open-plan office with desks and chairs, creating a soft focus effect behind the subjects. A blue pen and a blurred stack of folders or documents are on the table in the foreground.
Resources

Apple Design Influence in MedTech Product Development

YouTube video thumbnail

In this episode of Before the Build, Eric and Paul explore the growing Apple design influence on product development, especially in the medical device industry. Many clients now request their devices to look and feel like Apple products. But achieving that level of simplicity and elegance is not as easy as it seems.

The Impact of Apple Design

Apple has played a major role in elevating industrial design. Their products demonstrate the power of great user experiences, clean aesthetics, and intuitive functionality. As Paul explains, designers today often owe some credit to Apple for making design a valued part of product development. Many people now recognize industrial design as product design rather than confusing it with industrial engineering.

However, translating Apple-inspired design to medical devices introduces significant challenges. When clients say, “Make it look like an iPhone,” they may not realize the full implications. Apple’s high production volumes allow complex manufacturing processes like CNC machining to be affordable. In contrast, medical device companies often produce lower volumes, making such manufacturing cost-prohibitive.

The Challenges of Medical Device Design

Medical device development faces added constraints. Devices must last for many years, sourceable components must remain available long-term, and manufacturing techniques are often limited. In addition, regulatory requirements and clinical workflows introduce further complexity.

Eric and Paul discuss how Apple’s tightly controlled ecosystem gives them an advantage. Apple controls its hardware, software, retail, and packaging, creating seamless experiences. But medtech companies often face fragmented systems, especially when trying to integrate devices with hospital EMR systems. Even in well-funded hospitals, achieving reliable system integration can remain surprisingly difficult.

Balancing Inspiration and Practicality

While Apple design influence remains strong, medtech designers must balance aesthetics with functionality, regulatory compliance, and cost-effective manufacturing. As Paul notes, creating medical devices with Apple-like simplicity requires smart trade-offs, practical engineering, and a deep understanding of user needs.

Home use medical device usability challenges for a lay user managing a monitoring device at home

Most medical devices were designed for clinical settings, not the patients and caregivers who increasingly rely on them at home. Here’s what good home-use device design actually requires.

Comfort evaluation in medical device design showing researcher recording observations while assessing wearable device fit on a participant's wrist

How do you measure comfort in medical device design? Explore the tools, scales, and study design principles that turn a subjective experience into actionable design data.

Woman checking smartwatch health data UX design with concerned expression after waking, illustrating how poorly framed health metrics cause anxiety

Gathering health data has enormous value for spotting risks, improving care, and advancing science. The problem isn’t capturing the data. The problem is how we choose to present it and who we’re really serving when we do.

A gloved hand holding a petri dish with bacterial growth, illustrating the MRSA superbug explained in a Bio Break episode

Nick and Nigel break down the acronym, the biology behind it, and why resistance to this particular antibiotic class matters more than most people expect.