Understanding Endoscope Reprocessing

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

Understanding Endoscope Reprocessing

Sector: Diagnostics
YouTube video thumbnail

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene. These devices contain intricate internal channels and delicate mechanisms that make both cleaning and disinfection incredibly labor-intensive. With endoscopes routinely used in clinical settings, ensuring they are safe to reuse is critical for patient safety and operator health.

Why Endoscopes Are So Hard to Clean

Mark explains that endoscopes are inserted into particularly contaminated environments and are often constructed from materials that cannot withstand high temperatures. This makes steam sterilization ineffective. Instead, hospitals rely on high-level disinfection—an extensive manual and automated cleaning process that includes enzymatic scrubbing, flushing internal ports, leak testing, and finally, drying and hanging.

Innovations in Endoscope Cleaning

To streamline this complex process, manufacturers have developed new automated solutions. The Steris Inspire 300, for instance, eliminates the need for manual cleaning between bedside wipe-down and automated disinfection. Other innovations include the Pentax Aqua Typhoon and Nanosonics Coris, which use entrapped bubbles or pulsatile flow to clean hard-to-reach channels. These advances aim to reduce the physical burden on staff while improving the reliability of endoscope reprocessing outcomes.

Is It Really Safe?

While current reprocessing methods report an adverse event rate of just 1 in 1.8 million, the challenge lies in consistent execution. Missed steps and usability challenges can introduce risk, despite the devices being considered technically safe. That’s why innovations in automated systems are so important—they minimize human error and optimize hygiene.

Explore more in this in-depth episode on one of the most underappreciated challenges in medtech cleaning protocols.

Correction: In this episode, we mistakenly refer to the Steris Inspire 3000 as the “Steris Inspire 300.” The correct name is Steris Inspire 3000. We apologize for the oversight.

Smartwatch displaying heart rate waveform with text reading “5 Sensors, 46 Diagnoses,” illustrating wearable health sensors used for medical diagnosis.

Nick and Nigel explore how a surprisingly small set of sensors could be used to identify a wide range of common health conditions.

Visual comparison supporting clinical ventilator development and commercial device design.

Understanding how clinical ventilator development differs from commercial ventilator design is essential for teams planning early studies.

Hands wrapping Teflon tape onto a threaded fitting with overlay text asking if it breaks rigs.

Nick walks through a practical Teflon tape lesson that came from real work supporting a mechanical test rig.

Gloved technician handling sterile packaged medical instruments prepared for radiation sterilization validation.

Most sterile medical devices begin their journey long before anyone thinks about sterilization. Teams focus on function, usability, materials, and suppliers, then discover that sterilization constraints can reshape many of those early decisions.