Understanding Endoscope Reprocessing

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

Understanding Endoscope Reprocessing

Sector: Diagnostics
YouTube video thumbnail

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene. These devices contain intricate internal channels and delicate mechanisms that make both cleaning and disinfection incredibly labor-intensive. With endoscopes routinely used in clinical settings, ensuring they are safe to reuse is critical for patient safety and operator health.

Why Endoscopes Are So Hard to Clean

Mark explains that endoscopes are inserted into particularly contaminated environments and are often constructed from materials that cannot withstand high temperatures. This makes steam sterilization ineffective. Instead, hospitals rely on high-level disinfection—an extensive manual and automated cleaning process that includes enzymatic scrubbing, flushing internal ports, leak testing, and finally, drying and hanging.

Innovations in Endoscope Cleaning

To streamline this complex process, manufacturers have developed new automated solutions. The Steris Inspire 300, for instance, eliminates the need for manual cleaning between bedside wipe-down and automated disinfection. Other innovations include the Pentax Aqua Typhoon and Nanosonics Coris, which use entrapped bubbles or pulsatile flow to clean hard-to-reach channels. These advances aim to reduce the physical burden on staff while improving the reliability of endoscope reprocessing outcomes.

Is It Really Safe?

While current reprocessing methods report an adverse event rate of just 1 in 1.8 million, the challenge lies in consistent execution. Missed steps and usability challenges can introduce risk, despite the devices being considered technically safe. That’s why innovations in automated systems are so important—they minimize human error and optimize hygiene.

Explore more in this in-depth episode on one of the most underappreciated challenges in medtech cleaning protocols.

Correction: In this episode, we mistakenly refer to the Steris Inspire 3000 as the “Steris Inspire 300.” The correct name is Steris Inspire 3000. We apologize for the oversight.

A red defibrillator inside a white wall-mounted cabinet labeled DEFIBRILLATOR. A red arrow points to it, with overlay text reading ‘Locked away?’ in bold black letters on a white highlight.

Even the best-designed devices, prepared with careful simulations and usability studies, can behave very differently when used in actual clinical or emergency situations.

A hand holds a blue asthma inhaler against a light blue background. A red arrow points to the inhaler. Overlay text reads: ‘Used Wrong?’ in bold black letters on a white highlight.

Nigel Syrotuck and Nick Allan explore the surprising reality of inhaler spacer use. While these devices are often thought of as tools for children with asthma, research shows that adults struggle with them too.

Futuristic laboratory with multiple glowing blue cylindrical tanks emitting mist. A red arrow points to one tank. Overlay text reads: ‘Bacta tank. For real?’ in bold white letters on a black background.

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik take inspiration from a scene in The Empire Strikes Back to talk about real-world parallels to the Star Wars bacta tank.

A medical professional wearing a white coat and blue gloves holds a red cooler labeled ‘Organ Transport.’ Overlay text reads: ‘The call came’ in bold black letters on a white highlight.

In this Before the Build episode, Eric Olson and Paul Charlebois dive into the importance of organ transplant logistics when designing effective medical devices.