How the FDA Is Using AI in Regulatory Review

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

How the FDA Uses AI in Device Review

YouTube video thumbnail

The FDA AI in device review process is evolving fast—and it may transform how regulatory teams navigate medical device submissions. In this episode of MedDevice by Design, we explore how the FDA is using artificial intelligence internally to accelerate 510(k) reviews, improve predicate searches, and streamline labeling and documentation checks.

FDA’s Internal AI Tools Are Expanding

The FDA has already appointed a Chief AI Officer and is developing internal tools, including a large language model rumored to be in collaboration with OpenAI. Starting in June 2025, these tools are expected to be rolled out across departments. These technologies are designed to support internal staff—not replace them.

Faster Reviews for Common Device Submissions

Class II devices such as blood pressure monitors and surgical gloves may benefit the most from FDA AI in device review workflows. By using trained AI models, reviewers can automate routine predicate searches, validate labeling against regulatory standards, and identify missing traceability in submission documents.

Why This Matters for Regulatory Professionals

While novel and high-risk devices will still require close human evaluation, AI promises to reduce the review burden for standard submissions. This allows regulatory and engineering teams to focus more on innovative product development. Instead of spending weeks preparing repetitive documentation, they can rely on automated feedback to guide improvements faster.

What Comes Next?

There’s still a lot we don’t know, but the FDA is clearly signaling that AI will be part of the future of regulatory review. The ability to streamline standard 510(k) submissions could help improve speed, consistency, and predictability in approvals—benefiting both regulators and medtech innovators.

Diagram showing medical device at the center connected to clinicians, patients, and regulatory bodies with text 'Who are we designing for?' highlighting stakeholder mapping in MedTech design.

Every phase of a device’s life cycle involves different people with distinct needs—from clinicians and patients to service technicians and regulatory bodies.

A fluorescent protein assay sample glows under UV light as part of medical device cleaning validation testing.

Nick Allan and Nigel Syrotuck explain how a fluorescent protein assay helps engineers measure contamination and cleaning performance in medical devices.

Engineer assembling electronic components during medical device design transfer process.

Your team is ready for design validation. The prototype performs well, test plans are in motion, and everything points to a smooth handoff to manufacturing. Then your partner calls with bad news: they can’t build the device as designed.

Contract Manufacturer Rejection - Engineering team reviews early-stage medical device design and manufacturability during a design transfer meeting at StarFish Medical.

You’ve cleared the toughest engineering hurdles and proven your design works. Then, just as you prepare to scale, your contract manufacturer turns you down.