Medical Device Sterilization Methods Explained

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik seated against a white background, wearing lavalier microphones. The woman on the left has long brown curly hair and is wearing a beige cardigan over a taupe top. The man on the right is wearing glasses and a blue button-up shirt. They appear to be engaged in conversation or a video interview.
Resources

Medical Device Sterilization Methods Explained

How do you choose the right medical device sterilization method? In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark walk through FDA-approved options and explain how to select the right one for your product. From metals to plastics and electronics, not all devices can handle the same process.

Choosing the Right Method

The most common method is steam sterilization using an autoclave. This works well for metal tools like scalpels and orthopedic instruments. However, high heat can damage plastics, so it’s not always the best option.

For heat-sensitive components, ethylene oxide (ETO) is often used. It works at low temperatures, but requires long turnaround times and has safety concerns due to its carcinogenic nature.

Alternatives to ETO

Because of the risks with ETO, many facilities are moving to vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma. It’s safer for staff and just as effective for sterilizing low-temperature devices. The FDA is also encouraging this transition.

Radiation is another solution. Gamma and E-beam sterilization are fast and effective, but typically only available at large, centralized facilities due to safety requirements.

What About Electronics?

Electronics present a special challenge. They often can’t handle heat or moisture. Designers must plan ahead, choosing components and layouts that limit the number of parts needing sterilization. Sometimes, only patient-contacting elements are sterilized.

If no standard option works, novel sterilization methods are allowed—but require thorough validation. You must prove the method is both effective and repeatable.

Understanding medical device sterilization helps ensure safety, performance, and compliance. Selecting the right method early can save time and cost in development.

Thumbnail showing a vial of clear contrast agent on the left, with a red dotted arrow pointing to an X-ray image of a skull displayed on a tablet held by a person in a white coat. Overlay text reads “Not approved here?” in bold black and white text.

Nigel and Nick explore how contrast agents in imaging support medical device trials and diagnostics. While bones appear clearly in standard X-rays, soft tissues like those in the nasal cavity often require contrast agents to become visible.

A hospital patient lies in bed with a blurred background of medical equipment; bold text reads “Empathy in Design” across the top.

What does empathetic medical design really look like in practice? Eric and Paul discuss how emotional insight from field research can profoundly impact the design of medical devices

A disposable medical syringe is pointed toward a small pile of pennies, with a red dotted arrow connecting them. The text overlay reads, “So cheap. So complex.”

Despite costing just pennies, syringes pack an extraordinary amount of design and manufacturing complexity. From precision-molded barrels to breathably sealed packaging, these tools are more than meets the eye.

A healthcare professional in a sterile gown and gloves holds an endoscope, with a red arrow pointing toward the device. Beside it, a handheld cleaning brush is shown, symbolizing the manual cleaning process. Text overlay reads “Not sterile. Just safe?”

Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene.