Medical Device Sterilization: Choosing Between ETO, E-Beam, and Gamma

Two men, Nick A. (left) and Nigel (right), sit at a white table, engaging in a lively and friendly conversation. Both wear checkered shirts and lavalier microphones, suggesting a filmed discussion or interview. Nick holds tissue samples in one hand and gestures animatedly, while Nigel smiles in response. Each has a white mug labeled with their name and a purple star logo. The background is a bright white, creating a clean and professional studio setting.
Resources

Medical Device Sterilization: Choosing Between ETO, E-Beam, and Gamma

Topic: Bio Break
YouTube video thumbnail

Medical device sterilization is a critical step in development, yet choosing the right method is rarely straightforward. In this Bio Break episode, Nick and Nigel walk through how teams decide between ethylene oxide, E-beam, and gamma radiation sterilization. Rather than presenting a single best option, they explain how material choice, device geometry, electronics, and development timelines all influence the decision.

Understanding Medical Device Sterilization Options

When selecting medical device sterilization methods, one of the first considerations is how the sterilant interacts with the device itself. Ethylene oxide is a gas, which means it can penetrate complex geometries as long as there are pathways such as holes or lumens. Because it operates at low temperatures, it is often suitable for devices that contain electronics or materials sensitive to heat or radiation.

However, ethylene oxide also leaves residues that must be carefully managed. As Nigel explains, this can sometimes introduce additional concerns, especially during development or review board evaluations.

Radiation Sterilization: E-Beam and Gamma

Radiation-based medical device sterilization works differently. Instead of gas penetration, radiation passes through materials, which can be beneficial for long lumens or dense components. That said, not all radiation behaves the same way.

E-beam radiation typically comes from a single direction and has less penetrating power. Devices may need to be oriented or processed more than once to ensure adequate exposure. Gamma radiation, on the other hand, often comes from multiple directions and penetrates more deeply. This can be helpful, although it may also affect materials differently.

As discussed in the episode, metals can reflect radiation, while many plastics may discolor or become brittle under higher doses. These effects do not always disqualify radiation, but they must be understood and tested.

Prototyping, Time Pressure, and Max Dose Testing

During early development and clinical trials, timelines often drive sterilization decisions. Nick shares an example where radiation was chosen simply to move quickly, even though it caused visible discoloration. In that case, appearance was less important than speed and de-risking review board concerns.

Nigel introduces the concept of max dose testing. By exposing a device to the highest radiation dose, teams can confirm functionality under worst-case conditions. If the device performs as expected, lower routine doses are typically safe. This approach helps developers understand margins early and reduce long-term risk.

Making Informed Sterilization Decisions

Ultimately, medical device sterilization relies on experience, testing, and a clear understanding of trade-offs. Shape, materials, electronics, and regulatory timing all matter. This Bio Break episode highlights why sterilization is not a checkbox, but a design decision that evolves alongside the device.

Thumbnail showing the text “ETO or Radiation?” with a cloud icon representing ethylene oxide sterilization and a radiating burst icon representing radiation sterilization for medical devices.

Nick and Nigel walk through how teams decide between ethylene oxide, E-beam, and gamma radiation sterilization.

Medical device pilot manufacturing workspace showing engineers supporting NPI and scalable production

In MedTech, success rarely comes from invention alone. Plenty of promising technologies make it through verification and early clinical work, only to stall when the team tries to turn them into something buildable.

Thumbnail showing bacterial growth from one cell to 10²¹ cells, illustrating rapid bacteria reproduction with text reading “This fast?” and a red arrow indicating exponential increase.

From how much of your body is actually bacterial to how fast microbes can multiply, these facts are designed to stick with you long after the party ends.

Engineer reviewing a systems workflow diagram representing proportional verification planning in medical device development

In medical device development, verification is both a safeguard and a stress test, not just for the product, but for the process.