Proof of Concept Prototypes in Medical Device Development

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

Proof of Concept Prototypes in Medical Device Development

YouTube video thumbnail

Medical device teams build proof of concept prototypes to answer the most important question in development. What risk must be proven out first?

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark explore how prototype strategy helps teams reduce technical risk and accelerate progress. Early prototypes are not meant to look polished. Instead, they focus on testing specific concepts quickly and efficiently before moving toward more integrated systems.

During development, prototypes evolve from rough experiments to more refined devices. Understanding what type of prototype to build and when to build it can save both time and cost.

Why Proof of Concept Prototypes Matter

Every medical device project contains technical unknowns. The goal of proof of concept prototypes is to identify the biggest risk and address it as early as possible.

For example, engineers may need to determine whether a mechanism works as intended. In other cases, the question may be about usability. Will clinicians or patients interact with the device comfortably and intuitively?

Instead of building a complete device immediately, teams isolate these questions and design prototypes specifically to answer them. This approach allows developers to move forward with confidence while avoiding unnecessary complexity.

As Mark explains, the key is efficiency. The prototype should provide answers quickly so the team can move to the next iteration.

Functional vs Form Prototypes

Most proof of concept work falls into two categories. Functional prototypes and form prototypes.

A functional prototype focuses on whether the device actually works. These prototypes often expose the internal mechanisms without worrying about appearance or ergonomics. The usability may be poor, but that is acceptable if the goal is to confirm that the core technology performs correctly.

For example, engineers may build a prototype that only demonstrates the internal mechanical function of a device. Similarly, early electronics prototypes may include exposed boards, wires, or breakout boards. These designs look unfinished because they prioritize rapid testing.

A form prototype, on the other hand, focuses on how a device looks and feels to a user. These models are often produced using 3D printing methods such as SLA printing. They allow teams to evaluate grip, positioning, and user interaction before the internal components are finalized.

By separating these questions, development teams can explore multiple design directions without committing to expensive integrated builds.

Tools Used to Build Proof of Concept Prototypes

Fast iteration depends on having the right tools available.

In the StarFish Medical development labs, engineers use several technologies to create and evaluate prototypes. These include:

  • 3D printers for rapid form models
  • Vacuum forming tools for quick enclosure concepts
  • Mechanical test equipment such as tensile testers
  • Environmental chambers to evaluate performance under different conditions
  • Microscopes and inspection tools to analyze prototype results

Electrical development labs also support early testing. For example, engineers can evaluate electrostatic discharge resilience in early electronics designs.

Having these tools available in house allows teams to move quickly from concept to experiment.

When to Build Integrated Prototypes

Eventually, teams must combine form and function into a single integrated prototype. However, the right time to do this depends on the development risk.

Sometimes an integrated prototype is required very early. Mark describes an example involving an ingestible capsule that determines its location in the gastrointestinal tract. Because the device must operate inside the GI tract, the prototype needed to be integrated quickly in order to test the core concept.

In other situations, integration happens later. Once both functional and form risks are reduced, teams may build integrated prototypes to support commercial goals such as market validation or manufacturing scale up.

Ultimately, the purpose of proof of concept work is to reach the next development milestone in the most efficient way possible.

Split image showing a banana on the left and a medical syringe on the right, illustrating the difference between natural GLP-1 and Ozempic, with the text "Ozempic Explained" overlaid at the bottom.

Ozempic is a synthetic version of a hormone your body already makes. That hormone is called GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), and your intestine releases it naturally when food arrives.

Accelerated aging medical device showing heat damage vs normal condition

Accelerated aging in medical devices is a testing method used to estimate how a product will perform over time by exposing it to elevated conditions, most often heat. In simple terms, it is a way to simulate months or years of aging in a much shorter timeframe.

Doctor using tablet to monitor remote medical devices reliability with connected healthcare data and digital interface

In a recent article for MD+DI, StarFish Medical Software Manager Sean Daniel explores how remote medical devices reliability is becoming a defining challenge as devices move beyond traditional clinical environments into homes, workplaces, and public settings.

medical vs wellness device example showing alert vs no alert functionality

This medical vs wellness example shows how device classification can directly change functionality. Even when hardware is similar, what the device is allowed to do can be very different.