Apple Design Influence in MedTech Product Development

Paul Charlebois and Eric Olson are seated across from each other at a white table in a modern office setting. The man on the left has curly brown hair and is wearing a light blue button-up shirt. He is smiling and looking toward the man on the right, who has short gray hair, glasses, and is wearing a dark patterned shirt with a small microphone clipped to his collar. The background is a bright, blurred open-plan office with desks and chairs, creating a soft focus effect behind the subjects. A blue pen and a blurred stack of folders or documents are on the table in the foreground.
Resources

Apple Design Influence in MedTech Product Development

YouTube video thumbnail

In this episode of Before the Build, Eric and Paul explore the growing Apple design influence on product development, especially in the medical device industry. Many clients now request their devices to look and feel like Apple products. But achieving that level of simplicity and elegance is not as easy as it seems.

The Impact of Apple Design

Apple has played a major role in elevating industrial design. Their products demonstrate the power of great user experiences, clean aesthetics, and intuitive functionality. As Paul explains, designers today often owe some credit to Apple for making design a valued part of product development. Many people now recognize industrial design as product design rather than confusing it with industrial engineering.

However, translating Apple-inspired design to medical devices introduces significant challenges. When clients say, “Make it look like an iPhone,” they may not realize the full implications. Apple’s high production volumes allow complex manufacturing processes like CNC machining to be affordable. In contrast, medical device companies often produce lower volumes, making such manufacturing cost-prohibitive.

The Challenges of Medical Device Design

Medical device development faces added constraints. Devices must last for many years, sourceable components must remain available long-term, and manufacturing techniques are often limited. In addition, regulatory requirements and clinical workflows introduce further complexity.

Eric and Paul discuss how Apple’s tightly controlled ecosystem gives them an advantage. Apple controls its hardware, software, retail, and packaging, creating seamless experiences. But medtech companies often face fragmented systems, especially when trying to integrate devices with hospital EMR systems. Even in well-funded hospitals, achieving reliable system integration can remain surprisingly difficult.

Balancing Inspiration and Practicality

While Apple design influence remains strong, medtech designers must balance aesthetics with functionality, regulatory compliance, and cost-effective manufacturing. As Paul notes, creating medical devices with Apple-like simplicity requires smart trade-offs, practical engineering, and a deep understanding of user needs.

Indirect ELISA explained with antibody model showing enzyme linked immunoassay detection

Nick and Nigel walk through how indirect ELISA works, why it uses two antibodies instead of one, and when this approach makes the most sense in real diagnostic workflows.

Smartwatch displaying heart rate and ECG-style waveform, illustrating the difference between wellness devices and medical devices in digital health regulation

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik break down medical vs wellness devices and explain why two products with identical hardware can fall into completely different regulatory categories.

Nick from StarFish Medical demonstrating antigen detection using a toy antibody model to explain how monoclonal antibodies bind antigens in ELISA diagnostics

Nick and Nigel break down the ELISA assay explained in simple, practical terms using everyday models.

Magnifying glass revealing cracks with the text “This gets missed,” illustrating hidden risks in medical device validation and real-world use.

Ariana Wilson sits down with Mark Drlik to unpack why reprocessing is often one of the hardest challenges engineers face during development.