How the FDA Is Using AI in Regulatory Review

MedDevice by Design with Mark Drlik and Ariana Wilson
Resources

How the FDA Uses AI in Device Review

YouTube video thumbnail

The FDA AI in device review process is evolving fast—and it may transform how regulatory teams navigate medical device submissions. In this episode of MedDevice by Design, we explore how the FDA is using artificial intelligence internally to accelerate 510(k) reviews, improve predicate searches, and streamline labeling and documentation checks.

FDA’s Internal AI Tools Are Expanding

The FDA has already appointed a Chief AI Officer and is developing internal tools, including a large language model rumored to be in collaboration with OpenAI. Starting in June 2025, these tools are expected to be rolled out across departments. These technologies are designed to support internal staff—not replace them.

Faster Reviews for Common Device Submissions

Class II devices such as blood pressure monitors and surgical gloves may benefit the most from FDA AI in device review workflows. By using trained AI models, reviewers can automate routine predicate searches, validate labeling against regulatory standards, and identify missing traceability in submission documents.

Why This Matters for Regulatory Professionals

While novel and high-risk devices will still require close human evaluation, AI promises to reduce the review burden for standard submissions. This allows regulatory and engineering teams to focus more on innovative product development. Instead of spending weeks preparing repetitive documentation, they can rely on automated feedback to guide improvements faster.

What Comes Next?

There’s still a lot we don’t know, but the FDA is clearly signaling that AI will be part of the future of regulatory review. The ability to streamline standard 510(k) submissions could help improve speed, consistency, and predictability in approvals—benefiting both regulators and medtech innovators.

Black alarm clock disintegrating into particles beside the bold text ‘Faster launch?’ on a yellow background, symbolizing accelerating medical device development timelines.

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik explore how teams can reduce the device development timeline without compromising quality or compliance.

Gloved hand holds fluorescent liquid over a UV-lit surface with green glow and red arrow pointing to the light, captioned ‘See the Clean?

Nick Allan and Nigel Syrotuck explore a creative approach to visualizing cleaning validation using a fluorescent soil load.

Gloved hands insert a swab into a sealed vial beside a crossed-out O₂ symbol with the text “No Oxygen Allowed?” illustrating anaerobic sample collection.

Nick Allan joins Nigel Syrotuck to explore how anaerobic sample collection works and why it’s vital for studying bacteria that cannot survive in oxygen.

icons representing different medical device classes

Understanding medical device classifications is critical for compliance, risk management, and time-to-market success. Whether you’re designing a wearable sensor or a life-sustaining implant, knowing how your device fits into FDA Class 1, 2, or 3 categories is essential.