How the FDA Is Using AI in Regulatory Review

Ariana Wilson and Mark Drlik seated against a white background, wearing lavalier microphones. The woman on the left has long brown curly hair and is wearing a beige cardigan over a taupe top. The man on the right is wearing glasses and a blue button-up shirt. They appear to be engaged in conversation or a video interview.
Resources

How the FDA Uses AI in Device Review

The FDA AI in device review process is evolving fast—and it may transform how regulatory teams navigate medical device submissions. In this episode of MedDevice by Design, we explore how the FDA is using artificial intelligence internally to accelerate 510(k) reviews, improve predicate searches, and streamline labeling and documentation checks.

FDA’s Internal AI Tools Are Expanding

The FDA has already appointed a Chief AI Officer and is developing internal tools, including a large language model rumored to be in collaboration with OpenAI. Starting in June 2025, these tools are expected to be rolled out across departments. These technologies are designed to support internal staff—not replace them.

Faster Reviews for Common Device Submissions

Class II devices such as blood pressure monitors and surgical gloves may benefit the most from FDA AI in device review workflows. By using trained AI models, reviewers can automate routine predicate searches, validate labeling against regulatory standards, and identify missing traceability in submission documents.

Why This Matters for Regulatory Professionals

While novel and high-risk devices will still require close human evaluation, AI promises to reduce the review burden for standard submissions. This allows regulatory and engineering teams to focus more on innovative product development. Instead of spending weeks preparing repetitive documentation, they can rely on automated feedback to guide improvements faster.

What Comes Next?

There’s still a lot we don’t know, but the FDA is clearly signaling that AI will be part of the future of regulatory review. The ability to streamline standard 510(k) submissions could help improve speed, consistency, and predictability in approvals—benefiting both regulators and medtech innovators.

A healthcare professional in a sterile gown and gloves holds an endoscope, with a red arrow pointing toward the device. Beside it, a handheld cleaning brush is shown, symbolizing the manual cleaning process. Text overlay reads “Not sterile. Just safe?”

Ariana and Mark examine the complexities of endoscope reprocessing, one of the most difficult tasks in medical device hygiene.

Sterilizing medical devices using various FDA-approved methods - Image showing three medical-related items—a pulse oximeter, surgical scissors, and a catheter with a Luer lock—on a light background. A bold label at the top reads ‘How to sterilize?’ with an arrow pointing to the pulse oximeter, indicating a question about sterilization methods for these devices.

Ariana and Mark walk through FDA-approved options and explain how to select the right one for your product. From metals to plastics and electronics, not all devices can handle the same process.

X-ray image showing two human knees side-by-side. The right knee appears intact with natural bone structure, while the left knee has a visible knee replacement implant, including metallic components. A bold caption in the upper center reads "Bone or not?" and a red curved arrow points from the text to the knee with the implant, emphasizing the contrast between natural bone and artificial joint.

In this episode of MedDevice by Design, Ariana and Mark dive into the biomechanics and materials science behind osseointegration for implants.

Split image showing two close-up views of a human eye. On the left, the eye is seen through thick black-framed glasses, indicating impaired vision. On the right, the same eye is enhanced with a futuristic digital overlay of concentric circles and interface elements, suggesting advanced vision restoration technology. A red curved arrow points from left to right, implying improvement. Bold text at the top reads "Restoring Vision?"

Ariana and Mark explore how accommodative intraocular lens technology may one day restore natural vision for people who require cataract surgery or suffer from presbyopia. As Mark shares, traditional bifocals are not ideal, and new lens solutions may offer better outcomes.